{"id":318,"date":"2008-12-03T12:57:02","date_gmt":"2008-12-03T10:57:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/egophobia.dap.ro\/?p=318"},"modified":"2008-12-03T12:57:02","modified_gmt":"2008-12-03T10:57:02","slug":"automimetonii-si-stiinta-lor-mimetoida","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/?p=318","title":{"rendered":"Automimetonii \u015fi \u015ftiin\u0163a lor mimetoid\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"AR-SA;\" lang=\"RO\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"0mm 0mm 0pt;\"><span style=\"RO;\" lang=\"RO\"><span style=\"Times New Roman;\">Discutam \u00een trecutul apropiat despre semidoc\u0163i \u015fi semidoctismul lor \u015fi, pe m\u0103sur\u0103 ce \u00eei discutam \u015fi le luam \u00een discu\u0163ie \u015ftiin\u0163a, am ajuns s\u0103-i judec mai nuan\u0163at dec\u00e2t \u00eenainte, cu toate c\u0103 la fel de critic.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"0mm 0mm 0pt;\"><span style=\"RO;\" lang=\"RO\"><span style=\"Times New Roman;\">\u00cen mare, discursul meu actual \u00een ceea ce \u00eei prive\u015fte re\u0163ine acela\u015fi ton dezaprobator la adresa lor \u015fi aceea\u015fi lips\u0103 de apetit pe care le-am avut dintotdeauna \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu ei. Totu\u015fi, nu mai vorbesc despre ei la fel de absolut negativ \u015fi anihilator, fiindc\u0103 am ajuns s\u0103 g\u0103sesc anumite calit\u0103\u0163i \u015fi virtu\u0163i chiar \u015fi acolo unde nimeni nu s-ar a\u015ftepta s\u0103 le vad\u0103. \u00cen fine, dac\u0103 ar fi s\u0103 reproduc pentru varianta scris\u0103 ce-am spus despre ei cu ocazia respectiv\u0103, ar suna cam a\u015fa:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"0mm 0mm 0pt;\"><span style=\"RO;\" lang=\"RO\"><span style=\"Times New Roman;\">\u201eSemidoc\u0163ii nu sunt ni\u015fte personaje pur negative. E adev\u0103rat, nu prea ai de ce s\u0103 le admiri. \u015ei nici nu ar trebui ca cineva \u00eenc\u0103 neafectat de ei s\u0103 \u00eei imite sau, mai r\u0103u, s\u0103 \u00eei emuleze. Dac\u0103 nu e\u015fti ca ei, dac\u0103 nu e\u015fti unul de-al lor, mai bine r\u0103m\u00e2i ne-contaminat. Dar nici a fi semidoct nu e foarte r\u0103u, p\u00e2n\u0103 la un punct. Am s\u0103 explic de ce cred asta. Nu \u015ftiu \u00eenc\u0103, mai trebuie s\u0103 m\u0103 documentez, \u00eens\u0103 am \u00eenceput s\u0103 cred c\u0103 semidoc\u0163ii contemporani, specia intelectual\u0103 de oameni pe care o numim astfel, este echivalentul istoric, peste istorie, mai degrab\u0103, a sofi\u015ftilor antici at\u00e2t de blama\u0163i \u015fi evita\u0163i de Aristotel, de exemplu, dar \u015fi de Platon, de\u015fi p\u0103rerea lui despre ei era, sau doar p\u0103rea s\u0103 fie, ceva mai nuan\u0163at\u0103 dec\u00e2t cea a discipolului s\u0103u: mai atent\u0103 la detalii, a\u015f zice, aproximativ cum e \u015fi a mea, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 \u00eencerc prin asta s\u0103 m\u0103 compar, sau s\u0103 am un a\u015fa tupeu trans-istoric, cu \u201ecel lat \u00een umeri\u201d \u2013 \u015fi cunosc\u0103torii vor \u015fti pe dat\u0103 la cine m\u0103 refer \u2013 c\u0103 nu m\u0103 refer dec\u00e2t la acela\u015fi personaj. Deviez \u015fi bine c\u0103 mi-ai atras aten\u0163ia asupra acestui fapt. Revin. Spuneam deci c\u0103 am \u00eenceput s\u0103 cred c\u0103 semidoc\u0163ii timpurilor noastre sunt, sau par a fi, echivalentul peste istorie al sofi\u015ftilor antici, dar \u00eenc\u0103 nu sunt absolut sigur c\u0103 a\u015fa e fiindc\u0103 mai trebuie s\u0103 m\u0103 documentez. \u0102sta e primul lucru ce ar trebui re\u0163inut din noua mea p\u0103rere despre ei, acum mai nuan\u0163at\u0103 dec\u00e2t cea veche, \u00eentre\u0163inut\u0103 de \u015fcoal\u0103, de apropia\u0163i, de pre-judec\u0103\u0163i \u015fi de impresii \u00een general false despre via\u0163\u0103. Trec la urm\u0103torul lucru pe care mai am s\u0103-l spun pe aceast\u0103 tem\u0103. Nu mai sunt a\u015fa de sigur c\u0103 semidoc\u0163ii nu trebuie admira\u0163i pentru nimic din ceea ce \u00eei caracterizeaz\u0103 \u2013 am ad\u0103ugat \u00een continuarea discu\u0163iei despre ei \u015fi \u015ftiin\u0163a lor. Dac\u0103 \u00eei privim cu aten\u0163ie \u015fi le analiz\u0103m le fel ac\u0163iunile, oricare ar fi ele, observ\u0103m ceva aparent ciudat pentru judecata noastr\u0103 deja format\u0103 \u00eentr-un anume fel: faptul c\u0103 abilitatea lor de a p\u0103c\u0103li, de a ocoli adev\u0103rul despre ei, realitatea despre ei, este impresionant\u0103 pe scurt\u0103 durat\u0103, \u00een ochii celor mai educa\u0163i dec\u00e2t ei, \u015fi cu adev\u0103rat impresionant\u0103 pe termen lung, \u00een ochii celor de sub ei din punct de vedere educativ. A\u015f putea s\u0103-i numesc cameleoni intelectuali, fiindc\u0103, cel pu\u0163in unii dintre ei, o fac perfect \u015fi \u015fi-au transformat natura, \u00een fond defectuoas\u0103, de a-i p\u0103c\u0103li pe ceilal\u0163i cu neverosimila lor avansare \u00een cuno\u015ftin\u0163e \u00een cel pu\u0163in o <em>deprindere<\/em> ce se apropie periculos de mult de un adev\u0103rat <em>me\u015fte\u015fug<\/em> nici el foarte departe de o <em>art\u0103<\/em> veritabil\u0103 a simul\u0103rii unui inexistent <em>de facto<\/em> \u00eentr-un existent <em>de jure<\/em>. De la platoniciana deprindere p\u00e2n\u0103 la arta platonician\u0103 nu mai este dec\u00e2t un pas, \u00eens\u0103 la fel de, platonician, blamabil. \u00cen acest sens, dar \u015fi \u00een cel curent, intoxicat \u00eenc\u0103 de tot ce e mai \u00eenc\u0103rcat de pre-judec\u0103\u0163i \u00een noi, semidoc\u0163ii sunt personajele perfect negative, ce trebuie s\u0103 fie evitate \u015fi \u00eenvinuite cu orice ocazie pentru arta lor neverosimil\u0103 doar \u00een plan moral, dar chiar veritabil\u0103 din punct de vedere practic. Eu \u00eens\u0103, de\u015fi nu le \u00eencurajez \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi nici nu cred \u00een aplicabilitatea ei cu succes pe scar\u0103 larg\u0103, cu toate c\u0103 lucrurile cam a\u015fa \u015fi stau, am \u00eenceput s\u0103 \u00eei admir pentru extraordinara abilitate cu care pot s\u0103 p\u0103c\u0103leasc\u0103 mul\u0163imile. Poz\u00e2nd \u00een savan\u0163i, ei nu sunt de fapt dec\u00e2t analfabe\u0163i. \u00cencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103-\u015fi \u015ftearg\u0103 din memoria colectiv\u0103, de cast\u0103, fiindc\u0103 se pare c\u0103 au una, condi\u0163ia de analfabe\u0163i, nu reu\u015fesc, oric\u00e2t s-ar str\u0103dui, s\u0103 ajung\u0103 savan\u0163ii pe care doar \u00eei simuleaz\u0103. Amintindu-mi pe loc de teoria simulacrelor a lui Baudrillard, \u015fi ea inspirat\u0103 copios din largul eidos platonician \u00e0 la Whitehead, nu m\u0103 pot ab\u0163ine s\u0103 nu \u00eei listez \u015fi pe semidoc\u0163i \u00een lunga enumerare de simulacre pe care francezul o face \u015fi \u00een care, dac\u0103 \u00eemi aduc bine aminte, ei nu intr\u0103. Poate c\u0103 \u00eentr-o edi\u0163ie revizuit\u0103 a textului, filosoful simulacrelor \u00ee\u015fi va completa \u015fi rotunji lungul \u015fir de exemple de simulacre \u015fi cu cel al semidoc\u0163ilor, ce mi se pare nu numai a fi doar un exemplu, printre multe altele, care s-ar putea da \u015fi apoi analiza, dar \u015fi unul paradigmatic \u015fi fondator de teorie postmodern\u0103. Iat\u0103 al doilea punct pe care am vrut s\u0103-l ating at\u00e2t \u00een discu\u0163ia adev\u0103rat\u0103 despre semidoc\u0163i, c\u00e2t \u015fi \u00een aceast\u0103 redare a ei: c\u0103 semidoc\u0163ii, oric\u00e2t de neverosimili, simulan\u0163i \u015fi fal\u015fi ar p\u0103rea s\u0103 fie sau chiar sunt, au perfectat de-a lungul istoriei lor \u00eendelungate, probabil urcate din sofi\u015ftii antici, o adev\u0103rat\u0103 \u015ftiin\u0163\u0103 a neverosimilului, a simul\u0103rii \u015fi a falsit\u0103\u0163ii, \u00een primul r\u00e2nd personale, \u015fi pe urm\u0103 manifest\u0103 \u00een tot ce ating \u00een ac\u0163iunile lor, pe care am ajuns s\u0103 o admir nu pentru c\u0103 ar fi pozitiv\u0103 sau benefic\u0103 moral, ceea ce nu este cazul, ci pentru extraordinara ei manevrabilitate \u00een avantajul lor, cel mai mare dintre toate, de a-\u015fi ascunde propria fiin\u0163\u0103 \u00een fiin\u0163ele altora, c\u0103tre care aspir\u0103, dar care nu le vor fi niciodat\u0103 c\u00e2t timp nu pot ie\u015fi din propria lor condi\u0163ie ontic\u0103.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"0mm 0mm 0pt;\"><span style=\"AR-SA;\" lang=\"RO\">E o ironie, dar una \u00eentre\u0163inut\u0103 chiar de ei \u015fi de felul lor de a fi: c\u0103 semidoc\u0163ii pot fi admira\u0163i \u00een poten\u0163ialul lor pe care nu-l pot actualiza niciodat\u0103, tot a\u015fa cum \u015fi ei \u00een\u015fi\u015fi nu sunt \u00een fond dec\u00e2t ni\u015fte fiin\u0163e poten\u0163iale, imposibil de actualizat \u00een vreo form\u0103 genuin\u0103. Semidoc\u0163ii sunt ni\u015fte <em>mimetoni<\/em>, platonici, din p\u0103cate, iar arta \u015fi \u015ftiin\u0163a lor este <em>mimetoid\u0103<\/em>, dar \u00eenc\u0103 de admirat pentru gra\u0163ia cu care, p\u00e2n\u0103 la urm\u0103, se simuleaz\u0103 pe sine: ei devin <em>automimetonii<\/em> perfec\u0163i\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Discutam \u00een trecutul apropiat despre semidoc\u0163i \u015fi semidoctismul lor \u015fi, pe m\u0103sur\u0103 ce \u00eei discutam \u015fi le luam \u00een discu\u0163ie \u015ftiin\u0163a, am ajuns s\u0103-i judec mai nuan\u0163at dec\u00e2t \u00eenainte, cu toate c\u0103 la fel de critic. \u00cen mare, discursul meu actual \u00een ceea ce \u00eei prive\u015fte re\u0163ine acela\u015fi ton dezaprobator la adresa lor \u015fi aceea\u015fi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[295],"tags":[719,196],"class_list":["post-318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurnal-eidotomic","tag-jurnal-eidotomic","tag-patrick-calinescu"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=318"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}