{"id":438,"date":"2009-02-27T20:23:33","date_gmt":"2009-02-27T18:23:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/egophobia.dap.ro\/?p=438"},"modified":"2009-02-27T20:23:33","modified_gmt":"2009-02-27T18:23:33","slug":"antropoizi-si-pseudo-antropi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/?p=438","title":{"rendered":"Antropoizi \u015fi pseudo-antropi"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pe 3 decembrie 2008 publicam ni\u015fte g\u00e2nduri despre semidoc\u0163i, pe care \u00eei numeam, \u00een mentala mea imagine despre legitimitatea ianusian\u0103 a unei asemenea clase sociale, automimetoni<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Aproximativ trei luni mai t\u00e2rziu, mai precis \u00een jurul relativ al lui acum<\/em>, scriu despre pro\u015fti, c\u0103rora nu \u015ftiu dac\u0103, p\u00e2n\u0103 la ultimul r\u00e2nd al acestei note despre ei, le voi da un nume la fel de \u201etehnic\u201d (sau pur \u015fi simplu \u201epompos\u201d) cum au deja semidoc\u0163ii. \u015ei dac\u0103, totu\u015fi, voi ceda presiunilor propriului meu stil teoretizant \u015fi le voi atribui \u015fi lor, \u00een taxonomia mea rezervat\u0103 oamenilor cu minte \u00een diferite grade de atrofiere intelectual\u0103, un loc care s\u0103 sune \u015ftiin\u0163ific \u015fi stilist ezoteric, singurul motiv pentru care o voi face va fi, evident, parodic.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

S\u0103 precizez, mai \u00eent\u00e2i, de ce vreau cu tot dinadinsul s\u0103 scriu despre pro\u015fti, c\u00e2nd nici nu \u015ftiu \u2013 \u015fi nici nu voi afla vreodat\u0103 \u2013 nici cine sunt ei individual, nici ce anume \u00eei calific\u0103 pe unii s\u0103 intre \u00een aceast\u0103 categorie, a\u015f spune, complet inefabil\u0103.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ei bine, un motiv ar fi c\u0103 pro\u015ftii m\u0103 fascineaz\u0103 cumplit fie c\u0103 nu pot fi ca ei, fie c\u0103 nu-mi dau seama \u00eenc\u0103 c\u00e2t sunt ca ei. Oricum a\u015f lua-o, \u00eens\u0103, aceast\u0103 clas\u0103 social\u0103 nea\u015fteptat\u0103 exercit\u0103 asupra mea o fascina\u0163ie de neclintit, pe care subiectul ei nu o poate discredita \u00een niciun fel. Un al doilea motiv ar fi c\u0103, vorbind destul de recent despre ei, am descoperit c\u0103 au un poten\u0163ial uria\u015f. \u00cel voi preciza imediat, dar nu \u00eenainte de a l\u0103muri chestiunea uria\u015fului lor poten\u0163ial. Este un poten\u0163ial uria\u015f, adev\u0103rat, dar \u00een totalitate negativ, tot at\u00e2t de adev\u0103rat. Ei au un poten\u0163ial uria\u015f de a rata poten\u0163ialul uria\u015f pe care al\u0163i semeni ai lor nu-l rateaz\u0103 niciodat\u0103. De c\u00e2nd am descoperit acest lucru, ce, \u00een fond, e o contradic\u0163ie nefericit\u0103, m\u0103 tot g\u00e2ndesc de ce \u015fi \u00een ce condi\u0163ii pro\u015ftii rateaz\u0103 pe scar\u0103 larg\u0103 ceea ce de\u015ftep\u0163ii nu rateaz\u0103 nici chiar \u00een ultimul detaliu. Probabil, recunosc, am s\u0103 mor de b\u0103tr\u00e2ne\u0163e \u00eenaintat\u0103 \u015fi tot n-am s\u0103 fiu \u00een stare s\u0103 rezolv aceast\u0103 contradic\u0163ie.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mai fac o mic\u0103 \u00eentrerupere \u015fi mai am\u00e2n pre\u0163 de o fraz\u0103 sau dou\u0103 natura uria\u015fului poten\u0163ial pe care \u00eel au pro\u015ftii \u00een dotare, pentru c\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 m\u0103 refer, contrastiv \u015fi \u00een linii foarte schi\u0163ate, \u015fi la de\u015ftep\u0163i. Din punct de vedere social, ei sunt la fel ca pro\u015ftii: formeaz\u0103 o clas\u0103 social\u0103, numai c\u0103 o alta. Taxonomic, ei sunt la fel ca pro\u015ftii: apar\u0163in unei categorii, numai c\u0103 o alta. Ceea ce, totu\u015fi, \u00eei diferen\u0163iaz\u0103 pe unii de al\u0163ii e numai modul cum fiecare manevreaz\u0103 \u015fi \u00een\u0163elege uria\u015ful lor poten\u0163ial originar. A\u015fa cum am stabilit, unii \u00eel rateaz\u0103, iar ceilal\u0163i nu l-ar putea rata nici dac\u0103, probabil, ar \u00eencerca.<\/span><\/p>\n

Revin, \u00een sf\u00e2r\u015fit, la poten\u0163ialul uria\u015f pe care l-am descoperit la pro\u015fti. \u00cen fond, descoperirea mea e un lucru excelent, care \u00eei calific\u0103 a nu fi pro\u015fti. De fapt, dup\u0103 cum am \u015fi ar\u0103tat, descoperirea mea nu prea e bun\u0103 \u015fi nu \u00eei prea poate califica s\u0103 nu fie ceea ce \u015fi sunt.<\/span><\/p>\n

Uria\u015ful poten\u0163ial pe care pro\u015ftii \u00eel rateaz\u0103 cu at\u00e2ta, cred, incon\u015ftien\u0163\u0103 \u015fi indiferen\u0163\u0103, este uman. Uria\u015ful lor poten\u0163ial este de a rata uria\u015ful poten\u0163ial uman cu care ne-am n\u0103scut cu to\u0163ii. Consecin\u0163a cea mai grav\u0103, pentru ei, a acestui record este c\u0103, \u00een aceast\u0103 manier\u0103, ei \u00ee\u015fi rateaz\u0103 \u015fi umanitatea, \u015fi tr\u0103s\u0103tura ei fundamental\u0103: g\u00e2ndirea. F\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 g\u00e2ndeasc\u0103, ei nu sunt \u00eenc\u0103rca\u0163i de umanitate; f\u0103r\u0103 a fi \u00eenc\u0103rca\u0163i de umanitate, lor li se interzice s\u0103 fie umani; interzic\u00e2ndu-le s\u0103 fie umani, m\u0103 \u00eentreb, cu triste\u0163e nem\u0103rginit\u0103, ce devin la cap\u0103tul acestui silogism \u015fi la sf\u00e2r\u015fitul acestui great chain of being<\/em> interior \u015fi, \u00een consecin\u0163\u0103, ce r\u0103m\u00e2n ei s\u0103 fie. Mie \u00eemi este \u015fi team\u0103 de r\u0103spunsul strig\u0103tor la \u00eentrebare.<\/span><\/p>\n

Eufemistic, ei sunt fie antropoizi<\/em>, fie pseudo-antropi<\/em>, \u00een func\u0163ie de gradul de la\u015fitate moral\u0103 pe care eufemismul \u00een cauz\u0103 \u00eel disimuleaz\u0103.<\/span><\/p>\n

Idealist, ei sunt grava abatere de la norm\u0103.<\/span><\/p>\n

Realist, ei sunt chiar norma.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pe 3 decembrie 2008 publicam ni\u015fte g\u00e2nduri despre semidoc\u0163i, pe care \u00eei numeam, \u00een mentala mea imagine despre legitimitatea ianusian\u0103 a unei asemenea clase sociale, automimetoni. Aproximativ trei luni mai t\u00e2rziu, mai precis \u00een jurul relativ al lui acum, scriu despre pro\u015fti, c\u0103rora nu \u015ftiu dac\u0103, p\u00e2n\u0103 la ultimul r\u00e2nd al acestei note despre ei, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[295],"tags":[719,196],"class_list":["post-438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurnal-eidotomic","tag-jurnal-eidotomic","tag-patrick-calinescu"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=438"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}